Saturday, June 25, 2016

https://youtu.be/LO7E8UsKaxw

Fwd: Special urgent call to prayer



-------- Original message --------
From: Ron Schultz <rschultz@ilcsda.org>
Date: 6/23/16 6:03 PM (GMT-06:00)
To:
Subject: Special urgent call to prayer

Dear Church Prayer Coordinators and Prayer Warriors:
Elder Dan Jackson, NAD President, is calling church members to special and urgent prayer regarding a critical religious liberty matter breaking right now in California. (see news release below) Please make this a matter of personal special prayer as well as inviting your church members to pray for this as well!

Thanks so much!
Pastor Ron Schultz
Illinois Conference Prayer Coordinator

 

The following was taken from an email from North American Religious Liberty Association (NARLA):

 

June 2016 Update:

According to a June 22 legislative update from the Church State Council(the religious liberty ministry of the Pacific Union Conference),on Tuesday, June 21, SB 1146 passed from Assembly Higher Education Committee to the Judiciary with an 8 to 2 vote.

For those who have not been following this legislative struggle, SB 1146 incorporates a blatant attack on the right of religious colleges and universities to BE religious.It does this by eliminating the right of such institutions to "discriminate" on the basis of religion. In practice, this means that religious institutions are not allowed to be religious, or to practice their faith, without risking multiple lawsuits challenging their religious practices as discriminatory or harassing. It also means that such institutions will have to opt out of the Cal Grant program, depriving students who rely on such funding to have the option of choosing to attend a religious college.

Earlier this week North American Division president Dan Jackson issued a special prayer request regarding the legislation. He urged church members to activate their prayer chains and "pray that God will open the hearts of legislators in the State of California to His will as they deliberate proposed Bill 1146 on discrimination. Should this Bill pass there could be very serious consequences for our institutions of higher learning and all religious, faith based, institutions in that state."

According to the Church State Council's publication The Liberty Bell, the restriction on the religious freedom of religious colleges and universities is completely unnecessary to the core provision of the bill - a disclosure rule requiring religious colleges that file exemptions from Federal Title IX to inform prospective students and others of their policies regarding LGBTQ.

The Next Step: The California State Assembly's Judiciary Committee will hear SB 1146 on Tuesday, June 28.If you are a California resident, please join us in sending a very clear message that people care about their religious colleges and universities. How can you help? Send emails to the Judiciary Committee members (listed here), sharing you name, city you live in, and that you oppose SB 1146 due to the unintended consequences for students and the state.

For those who live outside of California, please join our prayer warriors in asking for God's guiding spirit on those making decisions about this potentially impactful piece of legislation.

For additional information, please contact the Church State Council at (916) 446-2552.

 

Diane

NAD Prayer Ministries Assistant

 

NADPrayerMinistries.org 

 





--

Friday, June 24, 2016

Christ our Substitute

Christ our Substitute

When I came to live in Chicago, I worked a few months as a substitute teacher.  A substitute teacher is a person who teaches a school class when the regular teacher is unavailable; e.g., because of illness, personal leave, or other reasons.  In some regions, the qualifications for substitute teaching may not be as strict as those for a regular teacher.  Some areas require a college degree and the successful completion of competency tests (this was the case in Chicago); others require only that the applicant possesses a high school diploma or its equivalent; others again insist on full teaching qualifications (Now the case in Chicago).  Standards are often lower for short-term substitute teachers, who may only fill in for a teacher during a short illness or personal day, compared to long-term substitutes, which are assigned to a class for up to an entire semester. Some authorities will allow a substitute teacher without any training in the subject to be taught, who will not cover new material but will simply supervise students working independently on work previously assigned by the regular teacher.  Some school administrators may not hire full-time teachers unless they have had substitute teaching experience.  Often, the role of a substitute teacher may be covered by a retired teacher from that school or district; in school districts that have gone through layoffs, some furloughed teachers may substitute in the district where they previously held full-time positions.

The noun substitute is defined as one that takes the place of another or replacement.  It is also defined as to serve or cause to serve in place of another person or thing.  As we can see from the above paragraph a person taking the place of a teacher, must have some training or education.  Most places by now require the substitute teacher to have similar training and academic training; which means that the substitute teacher must be an adult. 
In the game of basketball, a substitute player is a member of the team that plays as well or almost as well as the one who is substituted.  Also, as a member of the same team, the substitute has the same interest and goal as the player being replaced.  So, there is identification.  So, we can see that there are requirements for a substitute: 


1.       The substitute should come from the same pool of person substituted.
2.       The Substitute should have similar if not equivalent training (the same could be said of properties or characteristics).
3.      The substitute must be available to do substitute when necessary.
4.      The substitute should identify with the person being substituted.

When we say that Christ was our substitute, this must mean that He must have fulfilled the above requirements.  As God incarnate, He became one of us, so He came from our pool.  He grew up as we grew up.  He was trained as we were (or as we could be) trained.  He was touched with our infirmities and tempted in all things as we are (yet without Sin; Hebrews 4:15).  Many times it the bible says, that Christ was moved with compassion to serve others.  So, He identified with us.  Evidently, if He was doing the job, He was available. 

All of the above would qualify Jesus to be a substitute, but not our Savior.  To save us Jesus identification went beyond a mere sympathy.  Jesus became us.  The idea is that when Jesus came to this earth, we were all in Him.  Just as Levi was in Abraham when Levi paid tithes toMelchisedec.  We see this idea echoing in Romans 5 and 6 when Paul contrasts the two Adams.  Perusing the following verses we can see the idea,

Rom5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
Rom5:17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Rom5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
Rom6:3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
Rom6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.

When Adam sinned, we all sinned.  We were all in Adam.  But, when Christ conquered Sin in the flesh, so did we.  We were in Christ, which is why we die and are buried with Him.  So, we have resurrected with Him also; which is why Paul says that "in Christ, we are in Heavenly places" (Ephesians 2:6).  So when Paul says in Galatians 3:13 that, "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: 'Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole,'" He can do this because He is us.  Paul repeats the same concept in 2 Corinthians 5:21,

2 Corinthians 5:21 For He hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

Christ did not merely replace us.  He did not only die our death.  His identity with us was complete.  He carried our Sin and us in Him.  So, He suffered the curse that we should suffer, but we suffered it with Him. So, His victory is our victory.  Do we believe it? 

Originally posted on 10/28/2011 

Friday, June 17, 2016

Impetuous Living

Impetuous Living

The Queen of England was scheduled to come to America for an official visit. Her assistants thought that it would be good PR if the Queen was to visit a local American resident as part of the royal trip. Consequently, Mrs. Bolton, An African American woman of middle age was selected to have the privilege of the Queen's visit. Naturally, Mrs. Bolton was quite excited about the Queen's visit to her home. She had followed the Queen's life, and remembered her coronation, her wedding, and even when the Queen had children. But never had she imagined that Her majesty would visit her. In anticipation, Mrs. Bolton, who was an excellent cook, set out to prepare the best "'soul food"' she'd ever made. Even her neighbors were saying that her food had never smelled that good.

On the day the Queen was to arrive, Mrs. Bolton, as well as the press, the media, and security personnel were ready early. Unfortunately, no one remembered to teach Mrs. Bolton the protocol for receiving a Royal dignitary into her home.  Upon the queen's arrival at Mrs. Bolton's home, cameras flashed, videos cameras and recorders rolled, and security was tight. The queen, stepping out of her vehicle, began the ascent up the pathway to Mrs. Bolton's home. Upon seeing the Queen, Mrs. Bolton moved quickly through her front door, out onto the step, and down the path. In her exuberance, she both embraced and drug the Queen into her home. Reluctantly, the Queen obliged; yet anyone watching could see the discomfort on her face. The Queen's bodyguards became frantic; this had the unfortunate effect of scaring Mrs. Bolton, and making the Queen even more uncomfortable. Not one of the Queen's entourage was accustomed to a host or hostess behaving in such an impetuous manner. Nevertheless, calm was restored after explanations and apologies had been made. Mrs. Bolton, despite the faux pas, rejoiced that the Queen had spent a few minutes in her humble home. The British however, were loath to let the matter go and were indignant at the treatment received by their Queen. Accordingly, the scandal sheets reported the details of the event for weeks.

The scandalous nature of the Queen's treatment reminds me of the story about the woman who anointed Jesus. Her "impetuous" behavior was no less a scandal in her day. Let's read the account in Matthew 26:6-13 (KJV), 

 Now when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper, There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat. But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste? For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.
When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me. For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always. For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial. Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached in the whole world, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a memorial of her.

In Luke's account of this story -- Luke 7:36-50we notice that the host, Simon, also found this incident reprehensible, "for the woman was a sinner."  Unlike the Queen, who by protocol was not to be touched by the host, Simon refused to have anyone touch Jesus, which went against the etiquette of his day. However, no one expressed disdain for Simon's breach of etiquette. Instead, Mary, the uninvited guest, performed the welcoming ritual that Simon should have done; only she responded not out of protocol but from gratitude.  

In her concern for Jesus, Mary relieved His suffering. Ellen White elaborates in the following quotes,

"The fragrant gift which Mary had thought to lavish upon the dead body of the Saviour she poured upon His living form. At the burial its sweetness could only have pervaded the tomb; now it gladdened His heart with the assurance of her faith and love… And as He went down into the darkness of His great trial, He carried with Him the memory of that deed, an earnest of the love that would be His from His redeemed ones forever" (Conflict and Courage, p. 306).
"The desire that Mary had to do this service for her Lord was of more value to Christ than all the spikenard and precious ointment in the world, because it expressed her appreciation of the world's Redeemer. It was the love of Christ that constrained her. . . Mary, by the Holy Spirit's power, saw in Jesus One who had come to seek and to save the souls that were ready to perish. Every one of the disciples should have been inspired with a similar devotion" (Christ Triumphant p. 252, paragraph.4). 

Although the disciples had privately received teachings regarding Jesus' approaching death, they were uncomfortable with the idea and resisted it, which later left them unprepared for trial. In contrast, Mary, an 'improper' woman, not privy to the disciples' intimate knowledge of Jesus, was informed by the promptings of the Holy Spirit and believed. That kind of inspiration she received can only find an entrance in a broken and a contrite heart. Thus, Jesus commended Mary.  

The heart of Mary of Bethany was a grateful one. She had truly grasped the Gospel as preached by Jesus, which is why she behaved as she did. Yet, someone called her actions impetuous. In the Dictionary, the word "impetuous" is defined as characterized by undue haste and lack of thought or deliberation. Mary's actions indeed may seem impetuous to some, and wasteful, or shameful to others. However, Jesus gives evidence that the Holy Spirit was moving her to do as she did. By Christ's description of her behavior, it's my guess that we can perceive the impetuosity of agape-love as heaven does -- as aptly describing how God loves us, and the manner in which we will love one another as the Holy Spirit moves us. Moved by the Spirit, Mary Magdalene of Bethany gave to Christ her most precious and costly possession.
 
So, the question today, comes to us individually: is there room in your life for Spiritual impetuosity? Have you ever been spiritually impetuous? Have you ever been led by the Spirit to live your life not according to the dictates of others, but purely according to His Word, and His prompting? It's so easy to be impetuous about something we love. If we truly love Christ, let's allow Him to have His way with us. Who knows what that fragrance wafting on the air will do for another?
--